Saturday, August 15, 2009

PK Vita: Chronology Selected

from Knatz.comPersonal / Overview / Chronology2008

pk drawing (Paul Knatz)
Selected Chronology

c. 1965:
  • Started thinking about art as complex information: increasingly distinguishing data from information

  • First noticed Shakespeare's juxtaposition of the redundancy of the Fair Love and the oxymoron of the Dark Lady as a meta-oxymoron

    Simultaneously noticing an analogy between their contrast and the ageless struggle between Realism and Nominalism, between authority and experience
  • 1969:
  • Short stories found level of invention still not fathomed by publishers or public: for exampleFirst Week [see PaulKnatz blog]
  • 1970:

  • Encountered Ivan Illich and his models for Learning Webs in Deschooling SocietyFounded the Free Learning Exchange, Inc., emphasizing that the public networking of learning opportunities likewise mapped the public networking of all public informationAny public information system that doesn't note all the information is fraud: easily falsified (if civilized humans could only be got to pay attention). (Licensing teachers disempowers parents, licensing doctors dis-empowers all other (unlicensed) healers ...
  • 1982 ...:

  • NovelsLike my short stories, (like my scholarship,) my novels match contrasting abstractions: God / Lucifer, entropy / negentropy, heaven / hell, evolution / extinction, learning / inertia ...
  • 1995:

  • Knatz.com
  • 1999:

  • Invented MacroinformationWhile my Macroinformation.org remains a victim of federal censorship, see my Macroinformation blog: http://macroinformation.blogspot.com
  • 2004:Spun Knatz.com sections off into new independent domains: deschooling materials went to InfoAll.org; macroinformation materials went to Macroinformation.org.

    Lost my beloved friend, helper, patron: Catherine. She decided that 96 was old enough, and took off: orthogonally.
    2006:I added a new domain: AgainstHierarchy. The NYU sections collected all my complaints against my fraudulent graduate education, and In a masterpiece of post-Swiftian irony I told NYU that they were running out of time in which to take responsibility. On the fine morning of October 13 I went to the door to try to help a man who appeared confused and lost: the sheriff's men teamed up with an FBI posse in flak jackets, armed with assault weapons, put me on the ground, trussed me, and made off with me, leaving the armed thugs to steal my computers, my back-up disks, and to go through any of my personal records they felt like. I'd told NYU that I still held documents in evidence against them: nothing like interfering with evidence.2007:A federal court censored all my NYU materials. In fact all my internet files got destroyed: 5,000 of them, including my art gallery. Some of my materials are personal, but most of my web publications are public services.

    If Americans, and the world, remain ignorant of how institutions, including universities and governments behave, it's not my fault. It's true over my struggling body: and mind.
    2008:After thirteen months (of a fifteen month sentence) I was cast out onto the street, broke, but not broken. I'll republish as soon as I trust I can without getting assaulted again.
    2008 04 16

    I developed this section in 1995, expanded it a bit around 2001, and had done little to update it at my arrest in 2006. Now there's a great deal to add. Bear with me.

    Email me and I'll tell you how you can help.

    Paul Knatz Chronology

    from Knatz.comPersonal / Overview / Chronology1995

    pk drawing (Paul Knatz) Chronology

    A chronological curriculum vitae was one of the first things I mounted at my original home page, the precursor of Knatz.com. With Knatz.com still not recovered from federal censorship (or me from my arrest), I recreate some of the material here at blogs which have so far escaped the fed's grim scythe.

    The next post will be a Selected Chronology. It will be followed by a Detailed Chronology. It's the latter which will closely resemble the original 1995 version.

    Except that now, 2011 (April, May, June) I'm moving all pk domains materials to the PKnatz blog where I can control "page" menus, and sort by category! Post by post this blog is getting replaced, improved.

    Sunday, August 2, 2009

    Lex: Value vs. Drive

    pk Lexicon:
    Value versus Drive

    pk's lexicon is specialized. The dictionary, the encyclopedia, can give you only part of the meaning: you have to read pk, more than a little pk, to know the meaning; you could read lots of pk and still not know the meaning: if you don't read him "right."

    Value:The mother holds her baby. Is she paid to do so? Is she paid by the hour? Will she be promoted? (What role is there "beyond" motherhood that she could be promoted to?)

    The retiree catches a bass. He'd never fished before. But he experiences something his distant ancestors knew. But he didn't win a trophy, his name isn't in the paper, he's not running for President: is his experience worth anything?
    Drive:The mother leaves baby with the sitter. Dammit, she's going to win this mahjongg tournament!

    The executive gives up his fishing vacation (he's never yet had a single fishing vacation). The contract his company is chasing is just too important.
    "Value" is a term pk has long used in the present context; "drive" is not. The terms are formally paired-and-opposed by Jules Henry in his 1963 classic book Culture Against Man. pk arrived at the term "value," with great difficulty, in the middle 1960s, without having the benefit of yet discovering Henry's masterpiece. I came up with it in a (failing) effort to communicate what I meant by "God" to an aggressively deaf atheist: a very funny guy named Lev, a genius in some ways, but deaf-dumb-and-blind to religious emotion, religious metaphor. What was missing in his view that was present in mine? Value. His physics and mine were identical; but had opposite value.

    Jules Henry's pairing, value versus drive, dovetails with my response to Ivan Illich as the great Christian saint. Illich, Illich's Jesus, Illich's Roman Catholic Church (on its "good" face; unlike its bad face) represented value; blind progress, blind growth, blind expansion ... US imperialism in the Third World ... represented "drive."

    I'll proof this and add in some Henry quotes ASAP.

    Saturday, August 1, 2009

    Semantics: The Science of Meaning

    from Knatz.comTeaching / Thinking Tools / Semiotics1998 06 10

    Semantics: The Science of Meaning

    Mission: to promote the science of meaning, to emphasize the abstract nature of symbols — in contrast to concrete existence.

    Thought, TalkversusExistence, Events ...

    My module on Map / Territory confusions was the first semiotics module at Knatz.com, and was among the first Thinking Tools modules. It never got very far off the ground though. I was forever starting new drafts without ever finishing any old ones. That's a typical pk liability and its frequency of appearance is proportional to the importance of the subject: very important, very hard to do right. What I mount here today is a scrapbook from those drafts on semantics:

    Oh, you're just quarreling about semantics. How many times have you heard people say that? Hundreds? How many times have you said it yourself? Was ever a science held in such contempt by the general public?

    Semantics is the study of meaning, especially different meanings of a word. Is meaning trivial? Does ambiguity pose no problem? Are all meanings equivalent?

    (Ambiguity can solve problems! But not nearly so many as it creates.)

    Different specialties mean different things by semantics: linguists, psychologists, semioticians ... What I mean by semantics has been governed by Gregory Bateson and Alfred Korzybski. My start on what I have to say about it has already been up for months under the title Description vs. Thing. Bateson's additional step will come next: in harmony with Jung, he distinguished between Creatura, the world of life, and Pleroma, the world of extensional objects. We'd be wise to follow suit.
    1999 04 30
    I'll combine the two distinctions as follows:These days even car and burger ads talk about saving the planet. Does the planet need saving? Could we do it if we tried?

    I can't see how the planet is in any danger. The third rocky satellite out from the medium yellow star Sol has taken direct hits in the past by major asteroids and comets. Its orbit has barely wobbled. One day the star Sol with expand, swallowing the inner rocky satellites. I doubt that we'll be around to worry about the switch to an ambient temperature of one million degrees. Mankind doesn't have a very good chance of lasting another millennium let alone those additional hundreds of millions of years. No: any danger the planet is in is beyond our concern. The planet is mostly molten iron and nickel. A big billiard ball. A pebble we couldn't even see from another star. One of thousands of billions in the universe.

    The planet belongs in the class of Pleroma: things, objects ...

    What those meteor hits did do in the past was severely disrupt the biosphere: that thin skin of life which until recently was flourishing beautifully on and around the planet's crust.
    250,000 million years ago.
    70,000 million years ago.

    Is the biosphere in danger? Of being killed? That's not yet in our power and may never be.
    Is the biosphere in danger of being disrupted? That's already in our power: we've already done it.
    2009 08 01
    Can we, we humans, survive the disruption?

    I've switched sides. I used to hope we would survive: now I hope the biosphere survives: which I take to mean I have to root against us. Which I take to mean that I have to root against myself, hoping that all my hopes fail: that my writing will never be understood, that none of the messages God gave me to deliver ever get received: until it's too late. Then I hope they are received. I hope we'll see that we were offered an exit just as we burn to death in the fire.



    Lots more scrapbook remains to be mounted.

    Monday, June 15, 2009

    Home Page Top Page

    Knatz.com, toppled by the fed when they censored my AgainstHierarchy.org with its explanation of my anarchism, changed its top page every so often, then maintained an archive of old top pages. I now plan to resurrect some of those pages here, starting with those about me and how my biography reflects my philosophy (and visa versa).

    Best Dancer
    South Side High School, Class of '56

    pk at a Senior social, dancing with a non-seniorThe Dancer,
    Highlands Senior Social

    My high school named me "best dancer" despite the fact that I'd danced seldom since getting body-blocked by puberty! (That story was told, in part, at the destroyed K.) I forced myself to dance again by attending the Highlands Senior Center. I remembered a few steps, got back some of my muscle memory, recreated a bit of style: now I'm also teaching the ballroom and line dancing!

    The Board, led by my dear friend Ahn, elected me a member, and (at her suggestion) nominated me the above title: The Dancer. (Meanwhile others snort (and snipe at) the convicted felon!)

    (I met a fellow in the Palm Beach jail who recognized my name and introduced himself as a fan of mine: that is, of Knatz.com. Briefly, he told me that he'd first seen my name on a web site listing the ten "most dangerous" writers in America. I was listed in second place! (Evil! Imagine that! while unpublished!) He decided to see for himself, by actually reading what I'd actually written: and discovered "a hero"! "These guys should be applauding you," he said, indicating our follow prisoners (and the guards too). "If everyone read Knatz.com there would be no jails."

    Amen.



    This 2009 June I begin recreating some K. top pages here.

    For starters I'll post a spiritual portrait, then, Who (or What) is pk? ... followed by more previous K. Entrance pages. (Now moved to PKnatz.)



    Amen: except that you can't read Knatz.com! In proscribing AgainstHierarchy.org the fed (and pk's host, and pk's ex-family) destroyed all pk domains. Furthermore, in destroying AgainstHierarchy.org, the fed destroyed written proof of my innocence: they destroyed the document I was arrested for having written! Now we have only their distortions and misreadings of what I actually wrote and mounted. The fed destroyed the evidence! And then the fed threatened me with more jail if I re-post the truth!

    Don't worry: when I find the right place, and the right second, I'll remount it: with explanations: the author's own interpretation of his opus.

    If Shakespeare published his own reading of Hamlet, we would remain free to disagree with it; but we forfeit all claim to humanity if we ignore it: and deserve eternal hell if we destroy it.



    No: I'm suspending recreating Knatz.com here and am assembling it at PKnatz blog. That host's category and Page capacity is well suited to the complexities of K. structure.

    Monday, June 1, 2009

    Victim, Defender

    A neighbor did me a favor a while back. I hadn't known her at all before then, but I got to know her a bit thanks to the favor. She told me this story, I told her I wanted to retell it. I leave her named only by her given name, but she's welcome to authorize a full identification, as she will be invited to check and correct what I tell.

    Ruth lived alone but was frequently visited by her husband. He was living with other women, impregnating this and that one, but he'd visit Ruth, cajoling her for money. (They are both Jamaican, he rather obviously a RastaMan, with the 'dreads and all.)

    Ruth told me that once when he beat her she'd had him arrested! Pressed charges! Ah, but then she'd hired him a lawyer, paid more to get him off!

    Love. Go figure.

    Sunday, May 31, 2009

    Gang Rape

    I can't tell this story the way I would like to, it was told to me in confidence. I told the subject of the story that I wanted her blessing in retelling her story without identifying her. That permission she gave me.

    In brief, a young woman, twenty-two years old, was walking down a street in Indianapolis. Five men grabbed her and dragged her into an alley. All five raped her. The woman was blond, petite, and I don't doubt based on my present knowledge of her in her mid to later fifties, cute as hell. She was employed in construction, very strong she assured me. All construction workers there carried knives, she said. She did too: a switchblade.

    This petite gal, getting involuntarily gang-banged, got out her knife, flicked it open, wounded all five: killing two! The three survivors were betrayed by the wounds she inflicted, those three were later identified and apprehended. All three went to jail.
    2009 06 18
    Point of Fact: Yesterday the subject of the story told me that she'd seen my post while abroad and had added at least six paragraphs of additional details: names, descriptions, heights, weights, behaviors ... and a few additional facts. Notice, as of this date: those comments are not here!
    Others have also told me in person that they added comments at my blogs: all to no effect.
    My domains got censored. Somehow my blogs survived. Are my blogs being monitored? blocked? Also censored? Are YOU being censored? (Of course you are. That's what I started saying out loud in 1970, that's why I got arrested. That's why I'd been bottled and stoppered by the universities in the first place! I wouldn't have bothered to offer a cheap internet in 1970 if they hadn't!

    But to get to some of the additional details, I add those she was able to tell me here:
    Five guys rape her. She gets out her knife. She wounds all five. They gut her, leave her for dead in the alley.
    Two of the guys die, then and there. The remaining three are rounded up once she's rescued and revived, starts testifying. A third rapist, now hospitalized himself, proceedes to also die. So she killed three! Two, not three, go to jail. Three, not two, go to the bone yard.


    Again: five guys rape one little blond. She wounds all, kills two, sends the rest to jail. !

    But: they, while she was goring them, got her knife away from her, and gutted her with it, leaving her for dead in the alley. The next day some drunk found her, an ambulance came, and she's still here to tell about it — though she's much damaged. At age twenty-two our victim had much of the rest of her innards removed by the doctors. They cleaned out most of the rest of her guts, installed a colostomy.

    Today she has a little plastic vial instead of a large intestine. Electrodes buzz her when her substitute-colon is full and needs to be emptied. She's about to receive a plastic anus. Her body is still open so the surgeons can go in and out at their convenience.

    Much of the damage is of course mental. And then there's the chemical damage the doctors did: for thirty-four years now a jillion drugs have been prescribed for her, by dozens of different doctors, it being impossible for anyone to keep track of the drugs' incompatibilities, their side effects, the Gelstalt sum of their unpredictable combined side effects ...

    This gal is unbelievably cute and vivacious at fifty-six, you wouldn't think she was forty, yet several times in the months I've known her, I've seen her collapse and get carted off to the EM. The doctors want her to spend months at a Mayo Clinic in the north so they can try decipher all of her drugs and to wean her away from as many as they dare. (Her husband, a patient man from what I've seen, jokes that he'll have to take out a mortgage on her!)

    I'm posting this story as it is. I plan to show it to her and beg her to let me identify her, let her take some credit. This is a story that should be known by everyone: certainly by every woman, and by every man. We can't possibly have enough woman heroes these days, especially real woman heroes; as distinct from bullshit concocted by the media.

    I want to have her confirm or correct (and possibly expand on) the details here reported. I'd like her blessing in telling a few more details that I am confident of: the effect on me of the photographs she showed me taken after her first couple of attack-related operations.

    Hoping for her approval and her cooperation I now post this as it is. Come on, gal, say Yes.



    2009 06 18

    I think the subject is now glad that people are seeing her story. She may yet stand up and take a bow.

    But the main point remains: a "weaker vessel" defended herself! In the modern world! where everything conspires to make us dependent, while pretending to encourage independence: the schools, the churches ... the police, the firemen ... the doctors ...

    We need specialists to a point, but not past the point where we cease to be whole or complete persons ourselves. I'm afraid though that nearly all of us passed that point long before we were born. History passed that point for us.

    But if we exercise independence even while we're dependent, who knows, we might become a little bit stronger: despite the experts who don't allow us to move our own limbs without their approval.



    2009 06 19

    See today's StraightDope.com on the subject of self-defense, whether resisting an attack helps statistically, at what cost:
    http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2874/has-martial-arts-training-ever-helped-anybody-defeat-a-mugger